Talk:Ford Thunderbird (second generation)

I'm in the process of creating individual pages for each Ford Thunderbird generation, following the template of the Ford Mustang articles and others. All information contained in this particular article was simply relocated from the main Ford Thunderbird article. If the article has to be edited for copyright issues I have no concerns. My interest is merely to reorganize the Thunderbird article, which has become excessively large in trying to cover fifty years of history. --MN12Fan (talk) 01:13, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hangon tag

To clarify: this page isn't taken from the website noted on the speedy tag, it's almost certain that that site took the information that's long been at Ford Thunderbird and used it. Note that the first and last paragraphs are cut off on that website. --Sable232 (talk) 01:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds right to me, and I've declined the speedy deletion, but please double-check for potential copyright infringement. - Dank (push to talk) 03:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If someone doesn't do it first, give me enough time and I might rewrite the second generation and others to be more acceptable. A lot of the information on the Thunderbird here needs to be rewritten for better sentence flow, let alone for accuracy or plagiarism purposes. --MN12Fan (talk) 03:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction: 1960 square birds

The print version of https://www.hemmings.com/magazine/hcc/2011/02/Four-Place-Ford-Thunderbird/3695811.html — Mike Bumbeck (February 2011). "Four-Place Ford Thunderbird". Hemmings Motor News (Print). — states that 92,798 1960 Ford Thunderbirds were produced, not 92,843 per reference #7 (permalink): for a total of 198,146, not 198,191. (The math is correct in both cases.) --User123o987name (talk) 09:15, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]